Page 56 - Программа - Всероссийский конгресс с международным участием «Нейронауки: интеграция теории и практики», 18-19 ноября 2022 года, Онлайн
P. 56

Известия Российской
                 ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ                 Том 41, № 4, 2022               Военно-медицинской академии
                                                                                                                    405
                11. Kennedy S.H., Evans K.R., Krüger S., et al. Changes in regional   16. Li J., Ouyang W. Application of PET Imaging in the Brain Re-
                brain glucose metabolism measured with positron emission tomog-  gions of the Emotional Control Loop in Patients with Generalized
                raphy after paroxetine treatment of major depression // Am. J. Psy-  Anxiety Disorder // J Healthc Eng. 2021. Vol. 2021. Art. 4505227.
                chiatry. 2001. Vol. 158. P. 899–905. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.899  DOI: 10.1155/2021/4505227
                12. Mayberg H.S., Brannan S.K., Tekell J.L., et al. Regional meta-  17. Wu J.C., Buchsbaum M.S., Hershey T.G., et al. PET in gener-
                bolic effects of fluoxetine in major depression: Serial changes and   alized anxiety disorder  // Biol. Psychiatry. 1991. Vol. 29, No. 12.
                relationship to clinical response // Biol. Psychiatry. 2000. Vol. 48.   P. 1181–1199. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(91)90326-h
                P. 830–843. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01036-2    18. Shah N.N., Schwandt M.L., Hobden B., et al. The validity of the
                13. De Asis J.M., Silbersweig D.A., Pan H., et al. Neuro-  state-trait anxiety inventory and the brief scale for anxiety in an in-
                imaging studies of fronto-limbic dysfunction in geriatric de-  patient sample with alcohol use disorder // Addiction. 2021. Vol. 116,
                pression  // Clin. Neurosci. Res. 2003. Vol. 2. P.  324–330.  No. 11. P. 3055–3068. DOI: 10.1111/add.15516
                DOI: 10.1016/s1566-2772(03)00009-4                19. Passik S.D., Kirsh K.L., Donaghy K.B., et al. An attempt to em-
                                                     18
                14. Fu C, Zhang H, Xuan A, et al. A combined study of  F-FDG PET-CT   ploy the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale as a “lab test” to trigger
                and fMRI for assessing resting cerebral function in patients with   follow-up in ambulatory oncology clinics: criterion validity and detec-
                major depressive disorder // Exp. Ther. Med. 2018. Vol. 16, No. 3.   tion // J. Pain Symptom Manage. 2001. Vol. 21, No. 4. P. 273–281.
                P. 1873–1881. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6434          DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00264-5
                15. Horti A.G., Naik R., Foss C.A., et al. PET imaging of microglia by   20. Northoff G., Zilio F. Temporo-spatial Theory of Conscious-
                targeting macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) \\  ness (TTC)  — Bridging the gap of neuronal activity and phe-
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2019. Vol. 116, No. 5. P. 1686–1691.   nomenal states // Behav. Brain Res. 2022. Vol. 424. Art. 113788.
                DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1812155116                      DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113788


                REFERENCES
                1.  Lovelace DL, McDaniel LR, Golden D. Long-Term Effects of   after paroxetine treatment of major depression. Am J Psychiatry.
                Breast Cancer Surgery, Treatment, and Survivor Care. J Midwifery   2001;158:899–905. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.899
                Womens Health. 2019;64(6):713–724. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13012.  12. Mayberg HS, Brannan SK, Tekell JL, et al. Regional metabolic
                2.  Shah C, Arthur D, Riutta J, et al. Breast-cancer related lymph-  effects of fluoxetine in major depression: Serial changes and re-
                edema: A review of procedure-specific incidence rates, clinical as-  lationship to clinical response.  Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48:830–843.
                sessment aids, treatment paradigms, and risk reduction.  Breast   DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01036-2
                Journal. 2012;18(4):357–361. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524–4741.2012.01252.x  13. 13.De Asis JM, Silbersweig DA, Pan H, et al. Neuroimaging stud-
                3.  Tsaras K, Papathanasiou IV, Mitsi D, et al. Assessment of De-  ies of fronto-limbic dysfunction in geriatric depression. Clin Neurosci
                pression and Anxiety in Breast Cancer Patients: Prevalence and As-  Res. 2003;2:324–330. DOI: 10.1016/s1566-2772(03)00009-4
                sociated Factors. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19(6):1661–1669.   14. Fu C, Zhang H, Xuan A, et al. A combined study of  F-FDG PET-CT
                                                                                                       18
                DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.6.1661                and fMRI for assessing resting cerebral function in patients with
                4.  Yi JC, Syrjala KL. Anxiety and Depression in Can-  major depressive disorder.  Exp Ther Med. 2018;16(3):1873–1881.
                cer Survivors.  Med Clin North Am.  2017;101(6):1099–1113.  DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6434
                DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.06.005                   15. Horti AG, Naik R, Foss CA, et al. PET imaging of microg-
                5.  Crane TE, Badger TA, Sikorskii A, et al. Trajectories of Depression   lia by targeting macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 recep-
                and Anxiety in Latina Breast Cancer Survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum.
                                                                  tor (CSF1R).  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.  2019;116(5):1686–1691.
                2019;46(2):217–227. DOI: 10.1188/19.ONF.217-227   DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1812155116
                6.  Gong Y, Tan Q, Qin Q, et al. Prevalence of postmastectomy   16. Li J, Ouyang W. Application of PET Imaging in the Brain Regions of
                pain syndrome and associated risk factors: A large single-insti-
                                                                  the Emotional Control Loop in Patients with Generalized Anxiety Dis-
                tution cohort study.  Medicine  (Baltimore). 2020;99(20): e19834.
                DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019834                  order. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:4505227. DOI: 10.1155/2021/4505227
                7.  Jensen MP, Chang HY, Lai YH, et al. Pain in long-term breast   17. Wu JC, Buchsbaum MS, Hershey TG, et al. PET in general-
                                                                  ized anxiety disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 1991;29(12):1181–1199.
                cancer survivors: frequency, severity, and impact.  Pain Med.
                2010;11(7):1099–1106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00880.x  DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(91)90326-h
                8.  Liu Z, Xu C, Xu Y, et al. Decreased regional homogeneity in insula   18. Shah NN, Schwandt ML, Hobden B, et al. The validity of the
                                                                  state-trait anxiety inventory and the brief scale for anxiety in an in-
                and cerebellum: A resting-state fMRI study in patients with major
                depression and subjects at high risk for major depression. Psychiatry   patient sample with alcohol use disorder. Addiction. 2021;116(11):
                Res. 2010;182(3):211–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.03.004  3055–3068. DOI: 10.1111/add.15516
                9.  Fitzgerald PB, Laird AR, Maller J, Daskalakis ZJ. A meta-analytic   19. Passik SD, Kirsh KL, Donaghy KB, et al.An attempt to employ the
                study of changes in brain activation in depression. Hum Brain Mapp.   Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale as a “lab test” to trigger follow-up in
                2008;29:683–695. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20426           ambulatory oncology clinics: criterion validity and detection. J Pain Symp-
                10. Guo WB, Sun XL, Liu L, et al.. Disrupted regional homogeneity   tom Manage. 2001;21(4):273–281. DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00264-5
                in treatment-resistant depression: A resting-state fMRI study. Prog   20. Northoff G, Zilio F. Temporo-spatial Theory of Conscious-
                Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011;35:1297–1302.  ness (TTC)  — Bridging the gap of neuronal activity and phe-
                11. Kennedy SH, Evans KR, Krüger S, et al. Changes in regional brain   nomenal states. Behavioural Brain Research. 2022;424:113788.
                glucose metabolism measured with positron emission tomography   DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113788
                                                    DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rmmar111887
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61